0370 270 6000

Thompson copyright wrangle takes centre stage

9 February 2011

Media reports this week state that Emma Thompson is facing a copyright claim over her new film project “Effie”

The allegations have apparently been made by playwright Gregory Murphy, author of the play “The Countess”, which deals with the same subject matter. Thompson has now sought a declaration in a New York federal court that the script does not infringe Murphy’s copyright.

The story is a useful reminder that, both in the UK and the US, copyright does not protect ideas, but rather the expression of ideas. That does not necessarily mean copyright infringement must be textual (see Ravenscroft v Herbert where the substantial copying of incident, plot and characterisation was held to constitute infringement). However, copyright does not protect a general idea, or perhaps even a detailed ‘theme’ (see Baigent and Leigh v The Random House Group Ltd, a case relating to Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code).

Certainly, Murphy will need to show much more than the copying of a general storyline to make out a claim for copyright infringement.

Related opinions

80% hours for 100% pay? That’ll do nicely

As has been widely reported this week, some 3,000 UK workers are taking part in a six month trial to assess the viability of a four-day working week without any reduction in their normal pay.

View blog

Are whistleblowers entitled to keep their employer’s confidential documents?

In Nissan v Passi, the High Court recently considered the issue of an employee retaining confidential documents belonging to his former employer in the context of the employer’s application for an injunction seeking the return of such documents from the employee.

View blog

Important opportunity to comment on case law precedent

The UK government is considering extending this power to depart from retained EU case law to additional lower courts and tribunals, namely the Court of Appeal in England and Wales and the High Court of Justice in England and Wales and their equivalents.

View blog

Sky’s overly broad trade marks narrowed as found partially invalid for bad faith

Lord Justice Arnold has applied the guidance of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to the evidence before him, in the long standing trade mark dispute between Sky and Skykick.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up