0370 270 6000

No job too small – enforcement of the 2012 Olympics rights

8 February 2011

Mr Kichane, the owner of the “Café Olympic” greasy spoon in London, may reportedly face legal action due to his unauthorised use of the lucrative Olympic brand. The permissibility (or otherwise) of making any association with the 2012 Games is strictly governed by the LOGPG Act 2006, under the scrutiny of the organising committee (LOCOG).

LOCOG say such enforcement action is justified, because it protects the rights of the official partners, who pay millions of pounds to secure these rights.

Mr Kichane says that he received advice (albeit not in writing) from Trading Standards that his name for the restaurant would be OK. But now he is facing spending £3,000 to rebrand, which is a significant sum for his business. Mr Kichane is unlikely to be able to recover his losses because he did not take proper legal advice.

This shows how easy it is to get left with a bill for significant wasted costs – protect against this by getting advice from a lawyer.

Related opinions

IR35 rules to be scrapped from April 2023

The Chancellor’s recent mini-budget provided a significant announcement for business as it was confirmed that the off-payroll working rules (known as “IR35”) put in place for public and private sector businesses from 2017 and 2021 will be scrapped from April 2023.

View blog

80% hours for 100% pay? That’ll do nicely

As has been widely reported this week, some 3,000 UK workers are taking part in a six month trial to assess the viability of a four-day working week without any reduction in their normal pay.

View blog

Right to Work Checks: Changes from 6 April 2022

From 6 April 2022, right to work checks on all migrant or settled prospective employees must be online and checks on British or Irish nationals will be manual (free) or digital (charged for).

View blog

Are whistleblowers entitled to keep their employer’s confidential documents?

In Nissan v Passi, the High Court recently considered the issue of an employee retaining confidential documents belonging to his former employer in the context of the employer’s application for an injunction seeking the return of such documents from the employee.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up