0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

international forum shopping

25 February 2011

In a recent case against British Airways, the Court of Appeal has reminded us that the amount of work an employee need do in Great Britain before being able to bring an employment tribunal claim here, can be very small.

The case involved Hong Kong based cabin crew who flew to the UK 28 times each year. In London they completed a 45 minute de-brief before resting for about 58 hours in hotel accommodation and returning to Hong Kong.

The court found that this was sufficient to be employed “partly in Great Britain” for the purposes of the legislation, meaning the employees could bring race and age discrimination claims in the employment tribunals.

The case was decided under the old law, which has been replaced by the Equality Act 2010 which is unhelpfully silent on its territorial scope. For the time being employers who regularly send employees to do short periods of work in Great Britain should be alive to the possibly of domestic employment law applying to the arrangement.

related opinions

The UK - India migration deal

The Young Professionals Scheme will make it easier for young Indian citizens and young Britons to access visas.

View blog

Home Office Central Registry for modern slavery statement goes live - first universities publish statements

The Home Office recently launched a central registry for modern slavery statements. A growing number of educational organisations, including a number of universities, have published statements on the registry.

View blog

Equal pay at ASDA stores - appeal to the Supreme Court unsuccessful

35,000 workers working in ASDA’s retail business sought to compare themselves to workers at distribution depots for equal pay purposes. Find out more about this Employment Appeal Tribunal.

View blog

Supreme Court confirms that sleep ins are not working time

The Supreme Court judgment represents the conclusion on whether or not “sleep in time” should be classified as working time, when calculating the National Minimum Wage (NMW).

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up