0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

administrations – There's no escaping TUPE!

23 February 2011

In OTG Ltd v Barke, the Employment Appeals Tribunal (“EAT”) has held that an administration can never qualify as “insolvency proceedings with a view to the liquidation of the assets of the company” under Regulation 8(7) of the Transfer of Undertaking (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (“TUPE”).

Accordingly, unless employees have been properly dismissed by the Company or its administrators prior to the transfer, all employees will automatically have their contracts transferred to a purchaser under TUPE.

The previous decision of the EAT in Oakland v Wellswood (that Regulation 8(7) could apply to the purchase of companies in administration in some circumstances, including pre-packs) was not followed. This latest decision gives certainty to an area that was fraught with difficulty. However, it will undoubtedly have an impact on the appetite of purchasers to acquire the assets of a company in administration, particularly where the company has a large number of employees.

related opinions

Anti-social media - but when is it work related?

As the use of social media continues to increase, its overlap with working life is becoming more and more prevalent.

View blog

IR35 changes - six months and counting...

In his 2018 Autumn Budget, the then Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, announced a significant change to the way liability for IR35 breaches will be dealt with for private sector companies from April 2020.

View blog

Court of Appeal confirms all employment tribunal judgments must be published on the register, except in national security cases

Under the ET Rules, all judgments and accompanying written reasons must be published on a pubic register which the general public can access online.

View blog

Supreme Court backs employers seeking to enforce restrictive covenants: Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

The Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd has determined that where post-termination restrictive covenants (i.e. “non-compete” clauses) in employment contracts go further than reasonably necessary to protect an employer’s business interests, it can apply the ‘blue pencil test,’ severing the offending words and leaving the remaining enforceable clause in place.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up