0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

the extent of gold-plating

31 January 2011

Shortly after coming in to power the coalition government announced that it would end the “gold-plating” of EU directives – the practice implementing them in such a way that gives employees more generous entitlements. A recent European case shows the extent of the problem.

CLECA SA v Valor is a Spanish case where a local authority contracted out its cleaning services, and then brought them back in house. No assets where transferred in the process. The European Court of Justice held that this was not a transfer of undertakings under the Acquired Rights Directive, and as such CLECA’s cleaners did not transfer to the local authority’s employment.

In the UK the Acquired Rights Directive is implemented by the TUPE Regulations. A case on identical facts would be a transfer under TUPE. Given that such contracts are often terminated or transferred because of dissatisfaction with the current contractor’s performance, this situation is obviously more disadvantageous for UK employers than elsewhere in Europe.

related opinions

Anti-social media - but when is it work related?

As the use of social media continues to increase, its overlap with working life is becoming more and more prevalent.

View blog

IR35 changes - six months and counting...

In his 2018 Autumn Budget, the then Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, announced a significant change to the way liability for IR35 breaches will be dealt with for private sector companies from April 2020.

View blog

Court of Appeal confirms all employment tribunal judgments must be published on the register, except in national security cases

Under the ET Rules, all judgments and accompanying written reasons must be published on a pubic register which the general public can access online.

View blog

Supreme Court backs employers seeking to enforce restrictive covenants: Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

The Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd has determined that where post-termination restrictive covenants (i.e. “non-compete” clauses) in employment contracts go further than reasonably necessary to protect an employer’s business interests, it can apply the ‘blue pencil test,’ severing the offending words and leaving the remaining enforceable clause in place.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up