0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

the bell tolls for the DRA

13 January 2011

The government has today confirmed that the default retirement age will be abolished from 1 October 2011. Employers will not be able to issue new notices of retirement under the current rules after 5 April this year.

Individual employers can still operate a compulsory retirement age, provided that it can be objectively justified, although uncertainty remains over what employment tribunals will accept as objective justification. In response to concerns raised by employers, the government will introduce an exemption to the principle of equal treatment on the grounds of age, where group risk benefits are provided by employers. This will allow employers to withdraw such benefits after 65.

Employers who might have held back from performance managing staff nearing retirement, can no longer afford to do so, even if they are expected to retire in the next few years. In some cases, this may mean beginning a performance management process with employees who have been under-performing for quite some time.

related opinions

Anti-social media - but when is it work related?

As the use of social media continues to increase, its overlap with working life is becoming more and more prevalent.

View blog

IR35 changes - six months and counting...

In his 2018 Autumn Budget, the then Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, announced a significant change to the way liability for IR35 breaches will be dealt with for private sector companies from April 2020.

View blog

Court of Appeal confirms all employment tribunal judgments must be published on the register, except in national security cases

Under the ET Rules, all judgments and accompanying written reasons must be published on a pubic register which the general public can access online.

View blog

Supreme Court backs employers seeking to enforce restrictive covenants: Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

The Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd has determined that where post-termination restrictive covenants (i.e. “non-compete” clauses) in employment contracts go further than reasonably necessary to protect an employer’s business interests, it can apply the ‘blue pencil test,’ severing the offending words and leaving the remaining enforceable clause in place.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up