0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

new year, old deadline

4 January 2011

A gentle reminder that the new year also brings with it the end of transitional protection afforded to pension schemes following on from the ‘A-Day changes’ with effect on and from 6 April 2011.

Substantial changes were introduced on 6 April 2006 to the pension scheme arena – these are referred to as ‘A-Day changes’. Regulations were introduced setting out transitional protection for pension schemes so that the pre A-Day limits could continue to be utilised post A-Day without amending the pension scheme’s trust deed and rules.

The time is fast running out for pension schemes to continue to rely on the transitional protections. As at 6 April 2011 the transitional protection will lapse. Therefore, where the pension scheme has continued to rely on the transitional protection contained in the regulations, trustees and employers should act now to avoid any undesired effects resulting from the transitional protection ceasing to apply; for example an increase in scheme liabilities.

related opinions

Anti-social media - but when is it work related?

As the use of social media continues to increase, its overlap with working life is becoming more and more prevalent.

View blog

IR35 changes - six months and counting...

In his 2018 Autumn Budget, the then Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, announced a significant change to the way liability for IR35 breaches will be dealt with for private sector companies from April 2020.

View blog

Court of Appeal confirms all employment tribunal judgments must be published on the register, except in national security cases

Under the ET Rules, all judgments and accompanying written reasons must be published on a pubic register which the general public can access online.

View blog

Supreme Court backs employers seeking to enforce restrictive covenants: Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

The Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd has determined that where post-termination restrictive covenants (i.e. “non-compete” clauses) in employment contracts go further than reasonably necessary to protect an employer’s business interests, it can apply the ‘blue pencil test,’ severing the offending words and leaving the remaining enforceable clause in place.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up