0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Harry Potter and the alleged plagiarism

13 January 2011

The estate of Willy the Wizard’s creator has suffered a setback in his quest to claim damages for copyright infringement from JK Rowling and Bloomsbury. Readers will remember that the English High Court refused to dismiss the claim at a summary stage, because the case did have some chance of success (though the judge seriously doubted the strength of the claim).

Now, in parallel proceedings brought in the US, the claim has been dismissed, the court concluding that the two books were “distinctly different in both substance and style”.

This doesn’t necessarily mean that the claim is doomed to failure over here – a substantial part of the original book must be shown to have been copied, but there have been many cases where this has been demonstrated despite the resulting text looking very different in its totality from the original. But it certainly hasn’t helped Willy’s cause, and may yet prompt a settlement of the UK action.

related opinions

Government announces ten-year programme of school rebuilding

Ambitious funding plans, announced recently by the Prime Minister, have made clear that spending on school buildings is seen as a key element of efforts to stimulate the economy post-COVID.

View blog

Important opportunity to comment on case law precedent

The UK government is considering extending this power to depart from retained EU case law to additional lower courts and tribunals, namely the Court of Appeal in England and Wales and the High Court of Justice in England and Wales and their equivalents.

View blog

A landlord’s promise, a tenant’s power

When it comes to leases, most people believe that landlords hold most of the power. However, in relation to long residential leases, the tables may well have recently turned in one respect at least following a recent Supreme Court decision.

View blog

Sky’s overly broad trade marks narrowed as found partially invalid for bad faith

Lord Justice Arnold has applied the guidance of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to the evidence before him, in the long standing trade mark dispute between Sky and Skykick.

View blog

Mark Daniels

Mark Daniels

Partner and Head of Business Services

View profile

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up