0370 270 6000

Score draw in L'Oreal v eBay trade mark case

17 December 2010

The Advocate General (AG) has given his opinion on questions referred by the High Court in the trade mark litigation between L’Oreal and eBay.

L’Oreal argued that in using L’Oreal’s trade marks, eBay (in some cases) directed its customers to infringing goods and that it was involved in the infringements of sellers using its online marketplace.

The AG’s opinion is that on the face of it eBay is not liable for acts of trade mark infringement committed by its customers (since the function of the trade mark should not be affected). However, eBay could become liable, if it was notified of the advertisement or sale of infringing goods, and such infringement by that seller continues or is likely to continue in relation to the same or similar goods.

eBay are said to be pleased with the opinion, though trade mark owners will take comfort from the fact that eBay will have to remove listings for goods of questionable origin and could be liable for future infringement by the same person.

Related opinions

Dealing with Covid Rent Arrears – an overview but no specifics

Following on from our recent article on the release of the updated Code of Practice for dealing with commercial rent arrears that have accrued throughout the pandemic, we continue to highlight what the overall principles seek to ensure - fairness and proportionality for both landlords and tenants across each step of the arbitration process.

View blog

Relief for landlords as the Court of Appeal confirms that leases have been validly contracted out

One of the requirements for tenants to contract out of the security of tenure regime contained in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 is that they make a simple or statutory declaration before entering into the lease.

View blog

The High Court offers no comfort for beleaguered retailers

Whilst this decision may not be surprising, it will undoubtedly send a chill down the spine of retailers in a similar position to The Fragrance Shop.

View blog

Developers: disregard restrictive covenants at your peril

The Supreme Court has decided a significant appeal on the Upper Tribunal’s power to discharge or modify restrictive covenants pursuant to section 84(1) of the Law of Property Act (“1925 Act”).

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up