0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

affordable justice for environmental cases?

16 December 2010

The supreme court has cleared the way for the European Court of Justice (ECJ) to cut the cost of environmental litigation. In line with the doctrine that environmental litigation must not be ‘prohibitively expensive’ under Article 9 of the Aarhus Convention, the supreme court appeal committee ruled that the decision to refuse a claimant a protective costs order by the House of Lords was subjective and that doubt had subsequently been cast on that approach by case law, meaning that the matter should be reopened. A reference was also made to the ECJ given the uncertainty as to the current position on protective costs.

Though the decision by the supreme judges has only stayed the costs order pending a preliminary ruling from the ECJ it is hoped by environmental groups that in the future protective costs orders will be easier to obtain. If that is the outcome of the reference to the ECJ, it is possible that more speculative and boundary pushing environmental litigation will ensue.

related opinions

Meat-free expenses claims

Some schools have hit the headlines this week for their decisions to offer only vegetarian meals. But would a similar approach extend to the workplace?

View blog

Mergers of NDPBs - an environmental context

As more Non-Departmental Public Bodies (NDPBs) are merged (or demerged) to boost efficiency and accountability, how does that process impact on the employees?

View blog

FCA response on regulatory barriers to innovation

The Financial Conduct Authority has published a feedback statement: the latest effort in its ongoing push to foster competition through innovation.

View blog

Can the courts order governments to cut carbon emissions?

According to a landmark ruling issued on 24 June 2015 in the Netherlands, the Dutch Government is failing to protect its citizens from hazardous climate change and has been ordered to reduce CO2 emissions by 25% by 2020

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up