Please sign in with your existing account details.
Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.
Privacy statement - Terms and conditions
Forgotten your password?
You have exceeded the maximum number of login attempts for this email address and your account has been locked. An email has been sent to member of Browne Jacobson's web team and some one will be contacting you over the next two working days with details of how to change your password.
Are you sure you want to remove this item from you pinned content?
The government is actively considering increasing the qualifying period for bringing an unfair dismissal back up from one year to two years service although the timetable for a decision has not yet been announced.
The likely rationale for such a change would appear to be to increase flexibilty in the workforce for employers and, as a result, to encourage employment opportunities. If the change occurs, it is moderately good news for employers offering an extra year in which, for example, they could dismiss for poor performance, minor misconduct or redundancy without the requirement of procedural or substantive fairness – but there may be increased allegations of discrimination (or other claims where no qualifying period is required, such as whistleblowing) by those who would otherwise have lost the right to claim unfair dismissal.
The Home Office recently launched a central registry for modern slavery statements. A growing number of educational organisations, including a number of universities, have published statements on the registry.
View blog
35,000 workers working in ASDA’s retail business sought to compare themselves to workers at distribution depots for equal pay purposes. Find out more about this Employment Appeal Tribunal.
The Supreme Court judgment represents the conclusion on whether or not “sleep in time” should be classified as working time, when calculating the National Minimum Wage (NMW).
In a pivotal and much anticipated judgment for the social care sector, the Supreme Court has ruled that workers are not entitled to the National Minimum Wage for all time spent on a sleep-in shift.
Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.
Sign up