Please sign in with your existing account details.
Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.
Privacy statement - Terms and conditions
Forgotten your password?
You have exceeded the maximum number of login attempts for this email address and your account has been locked. An email has been sent to member of Browne Jacobson's web team and some one will be contacting you over the next two working days with details of how to change your password.
Are you sure you want to remove this item from you pinned content?
Following the changes to the Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) Energy Efficiency Scheme contained in the CSR Chris Huhne announced on Wednesday a new four week consultation on the amendments proposed by the government.
Unfortunately the consultation will primarily focus on the proposed extension of the introduction phase and postponing of the 1st allowance sale for phase two rather than dealing with the key proposal to not re-invest the money raised back into the scheme. Whilst the proposed amendments will no doubt help facilitate the broader ‘simpliciation’ review the government is undertaking and will crucially give participants more time to get to grips with the scheme it feels like any ‘bite’ and incentive in the scheme is being taken out.
Responses to the consultation have to be in by the 17th December to ensure that any changes can be in place prior to the start of the 2nd phase…watch this space.
Some schools have hit the headlines this week for their decisions to offer only vegetarian meals. But would a similar approach extend to the workplace?
View blog
As more Non-Departmental Public Bodies (NDPBs) are merged (or demerged) to boost efficiency and accountability, how does that process impact on the employees?
The Sentencing Council have released their Definitive Guideline on the Reduction in Sentence for a Guilty Plea, which sets out the approach to be taken by the courts.
Advocate General Kolkott’s opinion on 2 December 2016 highlights the importance of keeping up with national case law when dealing with EU trade mark opposition or invalidity appeal proceedings.
Partner
Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.
Sign up