0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

bigger NEST egg?

25 November 2010

The trustee body of the National Employment Savings Trust (“NEST”) announced yesterday that there will be a reduction in the proposed contribution charge from 2% to 1.8%.

The annual management charge remains at 0.3%, which will be payable from the employee’s pension pot annually.

The reduction in the monthly contribution charges will mean that employees who are members of NEST will see more of their and their employer’s contributions in their pension pot rather than swallowed up in administration costs.

The contribution charges were put into place to cover the initial set up costs for NEST. Once the set up costs have been recouped, it will be interesting to see whether there are any corresponding adjustments to the contribution charges.

related opinions

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

In this case, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. In the first instance, the decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. Read more here.

View blog

Can an application to postpone a hearing be refused?

This case highlights the importance of Claimants obtaining their own medical evidence in such matters especially when it is pivotal to their claim.

View blog

Employer obliged to pay settlement despite employees confidentiality breach

In Duchy Farm Kennels Ltd v Steels the employer was found not to have been relieved of its obligation to pay a settlement sum, despite the former employee having breached the confidentiality clause contained in the settlement agreement.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up