0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

anonymity TAKES THAT! Court of appeal lifts super injunction

22 November 2010

Take That star Howard Donald was named as a party to proceedings with Adakini Ntuli with whom he had previously had a relationship.

The High Court granted an injunction against the publication of her story and also granted an anonymity order and an order restraining the reporting of the fact of the proceedings. On appeal, the Court of Appeal continued the substantive injunction but overturned the anonymity and restraining reporting restrictions on the grounds that they were unjustified.

This decision weighs public interest against the right to privacy. But, unlike other competing human rights, the scales are not set fair. “Necessity” was the hurdle to be overcome by Mr Donald. He failed to establish that the mere reporting of the proceedings would be significantly invasive to his private life.

How would we all feel about a newspaper naming us as a party to privacy proceedings which, if unsuccessful, would result in the publication of sexually explicit details of our relationships? I, for one, would feel aggrieved.

related opinions

A year on: the Capped Costs Pilot Scheme

On 14 January 2019 a Capped Costs Pilot Scheme was introduced in the Leeds and Manchester Business and Property Courts, and has been set to run for two years.

View blog

Supreme Court provides comfort to public authorities facing village green applications

In a lengthy majority judgment accompanied by two powerful dissenting opinions, the Supreme Court found yesterday that land acquired and held for statutory purposes cannot be registered as a village green where that registration is incompatible with the statutory purpose for which it is held.

View blog

Supreme Court extends whistle-blower protection

The decision of the Supreme Court extends the scope of whistle-blower protection and is a wider approach than that taken in direct discrimination claims.

View blog

Capability – the cost of getting it wrong

An 89 year old former patient pathway co-ordinator has been awarded £200,000 by an Employment Tribunal for unfair dismissal and age and disability discrimination following her dismissal on capability grounds.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up