0370 270 6000

Who is the domain name hijacker?

8 October 2010

Brand owners regularly have to deal with that unsavoury character – the domain name hijacker. However, the recent complaint filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre (the Centre) by M Corentin Benoit Thiercelin against CyberDeal shows how easily a complainant can become the hijacker rather than the hijacked.

Thiercelin asserted that CyberDeal had registered the domain name in question in bad faith in order to prevent him from reflecting the trade mark in a corresponding domain name. However, the Centre declared that as CyberDeal had registered the domain name well before Thiercelin registered his trade marks or acquired common law trade mark rights and, as there was no evidence that CyberDeal had been aware of Thiercelin’s plans to use the trade mark at the point of registration, the claim had been brought in bad faith constituting an abuse of the administrative proceedings. Thiercelin was attempting to use the complaints process to deprive a registered domain name holder of a domain name – Reverse Domain Name Hijacking . So brand owners think before complaining – are you a hijacker?

Related opinions

Right to Work Checks: Changes from 6 April 2022

From 6 April 2022, right to work checks on all migrant or settled prospective employees must be online and checks on British or Irish nationals will be manual (free) or digital (charged for).

View blog

Are whistleblowers entitled to keep their employer’s confidential documents?

In Nissan v Passi, the High Court recently considered the issue of an employee retaining confidential documents belonging to his former employer in the context of the employer’s application for an injunction seeking the return of such documents from the employee.

View blog

Directors who fail to prepare, should prepare to fail

Two recent judgments demonstrate the risk that directors (of insolvent companies) face of being personally liable if appropriate records and procedures are not followed and if it cannot be shown that certain payments were in the interests of the company.

View blog

Impact of Covid-19 upon level of fine

Two cases have considered the issue of Covid 19 as part of the sentencing exercise. In the most recent, failures by a principal contractor Modus Workspace, who design and refit refurbishments, led to a £1.1 million fine after an engineer was injured from a fall from a roof.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up