0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

TUPE – A more measured approach needed

10 September 2010

The TUPE regulations require outgoing employers to inform and consult with employee representatives if they envisage taking measures in respect of employees. Outgoing employers rarely take such measures, or so we thought.

In Todd v Strain the transfer happened on 4 January 2008. The outgoing employer paid wages for 1 to 3 January shortly after the transfer, rather than at the end of the month, estimating the PAYE deductions. The Employment Appeal Tribunal decided that this was a “measure” that required consultation. This decision means that seemingly harmless administrative steps needed in TUPE transfers that have no adverse consequences for employees are ‘measures’ requiring consultation – an obligation to be taken seriously, since an Employment Tribunal can award up to 13 weeks’ pay per employee for a failure to comply.

Such a literal interpretation of the regulations is surely not what was intended?

related opinions

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

In this case, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. In the first instance, the decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. Read more here.

View blog

Can an application to postpone a hearing be refused?

This case highlights the importance of Claimants obtaining their own medical evidence in such matters especially when it is pivotal to their claim.

View blog

Employer obliged to pay settlement despite employees confidentiality breach

In Duchy Farm Kennels Ltd v Steels the employer was found not to have been relieved of its obligation to pay a settlement sum, despite the former employee having breached the confidentiality clause contained in the settlement agreement.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up