0370 270 6000

The Buzz surrounding Google’s $8.5 million settlement

10 September 2010

Google have agreed to pay $8.5 million to settle a class action brought by a group of customers using Gmail accounts (Google’s email service).

Google signed up its Gmail users to BUZZ, their new social networking application, without their prior consent. The BUZZ application created the user’s network on the basis of their email contacts but Gmail users objected saying that this violated their privacy, as Google’s activities resulted in Gmail users contact details being shared with others against their wishes.

With a proportion of the settlement payment going to organisations educating and promoting online privacy, this case illustrates the importance of online privacy and the need to get users consent to the receipt of services via opt in/opt out controls prior to launch. Having seen Google stung for $8.5 million in this case, hopefully others will not be inclined to indulge in similar ‘anti-social’ networking.

Related opinions

80% hours for 100% pay? That’ll do nicely

As has been widely reported this week, some 3,000 UK workers are taking part in a six month trial to assess the viability of a four-day working week without any reduction in their normal pay.

View blog

Are whistleblowers entitled to keep their employer’s confidential documents?

In Nissan v Passi, the High Court recently considered the issue of an employee retaining confidential documents belonging to his former employer in the context of the employer’s application for an injunction seeking the return of such documents from the employee.

View blog

Important opportunity to comment on case law precedent

The UK government is considering extending this power to depart from retained EU case law to additional lower courts and tribunals, namely the Court of Appeal in England and Wales and the High Court of Justice in England and Wales and their equivalents.

View blog

Sky’s overly broad trade marks narrowed as found partially invalid for bad faith

Lord Justice Arnold has applied the guidance of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to the evidence before him, in the long standing trade mark dispute between Sky and Skykick.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up