0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

say what you mean

24 September 2010

What’s the difference between the allegations ‘loss of £3,000′ and ‘theft of £3,000’? A finding of unfair dismissal says the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Celebi v Compass.

Mrs Celebi’s employers invited her to a disciplinary hearing regarding the allegation ‘loss of £3,000’. The evidence put to the tribunal was that they actually believed she had stolen the money. The fact that Mrs Celebi appeared to accept at the time that she knew she was being accused of theft could not be relied upon by her employers and it was at that point that the allegations should have been clarified. The EAT held that ‘it is a logical conclusion of a failure to put the allegation of theft to the claimant that the dismissal is unfair.’
The lesson to be learnt from this case is to say what you mean and not to try and save an employee’s feelings by attempting to soften an allegation.

related opinions

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

In this case, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. In the first instance, the decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. Read more here.

View blog

Can an application to postpone a hearing be refused?

This case highlights the importance of Claimants obtaining their own medical evidence in such matters especially when it is pivotal to their claim.

View blog

Employer obliged to pay settlement despite employees confidentiality breach

In Duchy Farm Kennels Ltd v Steels the employer was found not to have been relieved of its obligation to pay a settlement sum, despite the former employee having breached the confidentiality clause contained in the settlement agreement.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up