0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Say what you mean

24 September 2010

What’s the difference between the allegations ‘loss of £3,000′ and ‘theft of £3,000’? A finding of unfair dismissal says the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Celebi v Compass.

Mrs Celebi’s employers invited her to a disciplinary hearing regarding the allegation ‘loss of £3,000’. The evidence put to the tribunal was that they actually believed she had stolen the money. The fact that Mrs Celebi appeared to accept at the time that she knew she was being accused of theft could not be relied upon by her employers and it was at that point that the allegations should have been clarified. The EAT held that ‘it is a logical conclusion of a failure to put the allegation of theft to the claimant that the dismissal is unfair.’
The lesson to be learnt from this case is to say what you mean and not to try and save an employee’s feelings by attempting to soften an allegation.

Related opinions

Symptoms of menopause can constitute a disability

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) recently found that an employment tribunal was wrong to strike out a claim on grounds that menopausal symptoms did not amount to a disability under the Equality Act 2010 (Rooney v Leicester City Council).

View blog

Employment Appeal Tribunal rules no entitlement to pay for zero-hour worker during a period of suspension

In a recent case the Employment Appeal Tribunal determined that, as a zero-hour worker, the Claimant was not entitled to be paid whilst he was suspended pending an investigation into an allegation of misconduct.

View blog

Flexible working and leave for carers

The Government has launched a consultation today on potential changes to the statutory flexible working regime.

View blog

Importance of considering flexible working applications

An employment tribunal has awarded an employee almost £185,000 for indirect discrimination following a failure to adequately consider the employee’s flexible working request.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up