0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

send them back... but please pay the postage!

28 April 2010

Consumers who return goods purchased online or over the telephone must be able to recover any initial delivery costs as well as the price paid for the goods following a recent case before the ECJ. However the cost of returning the goods can still be passed on to the consumer.

The case concerned the interpretation of the Distance Selling Directive Articles 6 (1) & (2) which allows a consumer to cancel a contract within 7 days, without incurring any charges.

Currently many sales terms require consumers to forfeit any delivery costs they might have paid when they bought the goods. It now seems likely that companies will need to change their terms – and some who might have relied on a customer’s reluctance to pay postage to avoid the full cost of returns may finally have to take the legislation seriously.  For companies that supply large items to customers such as sofas, fridges and household furniture this is likely to increase the cost of doing business online.

related opinions

COVID-19 child protection practice - four months in - lessons learned so far

In June 2020 the University of Birmingham published a research briefing exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on child protection practice.

View blog

“Caution” is now the watchword when it comes to directly awarding public sectors contracts

The judicial review proceedings brought by the Good Law Project against the Department of Health and Social Care in relation to the £108m contract the Department awarded for PPE in April are about to shine a light on Regulation 32(2)(c) of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015.

View blog

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

In this case, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. In the first instance, the decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. Read more here.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up