0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

send them back... but please pay the postage!

28 April 2010

Consumers who return goods purchased online or over the telephone must be able to recover any initial delivery costs as well as the price paid for the goods following a recent case before the ECJ. However the cost of returning the goods can still be passed on to the consumer.

The case concerned the interpretation of the Distance Selling Directive Articles 6 (1) & (2) which allows a consumer to cancel a contract within 7 days, without incurring any charges.

Currently many sales terms require consumers to forfeit any delivery costs they might have paid when they bought the goods. It now seems likely that companies will need to change their terms – and some who might have relied on a customer’s reluctance to pay postage to avoid the full cost of returns may finally have to take the legislation seriously.  For companies that supply large items to customers such as sofas, fridges and household furniture this is likely to increase the cost of doing business online.

related opinions

World Menopause Day

To mark this, ACAS has produced new guidance for managing the menopause at work, providing advice on the symptoms and potential impact of the menopause and the types of support that can be offered.

View blog

Sexual Harassment in the workplace – consequences of getting it wrong

A partner at a Magic Circle law firm has this week been ordered to pay £235,000 in fines and costs by a disciplinary tribunal, having been found guilty of breaching his professional obligations.

View blog

High Court finds against WASPI women

The High Court has rejected the judicial review claim brought by the campaign group BackTo60 against the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP).

View blog

When does misconduct by a professional amount to professional misconduct?

The Court of Appeal has considered what amounts to professional conduct for the purposes of the MHPS in the case of Idu –v- The East Suffolk & North Essex NHS Foundation Trust.
The allegations raised against the Appellant surgeon included, amongst others, refusals to follow management instructions and inappropriate (rude, uncivil, and, on occasions, aggressive) verbal and written communications.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up