0370 270 6000

Toryfail - why moderation might be a good idea

26 March 2010

This week the Conservative Party launched the cash-gordon.com website, aimed at highlighting the Labour Party’s funding links to Charlie Whelan’s Unite union.

Unfortunately, basic technical errors and the inclusion of a live Twitter feed, led to the site being bombarded with abusive messages and colourful language.

Publishers, including webhosts and hosts of forum boards, can be held liable for the statements they publish, including liability in defamation.

In practice, once webhosts are notified by an aggrieved party that they are, unbeknownst to them, hosting alleged defamatory content, the content is removed.

However, for a high profile website with a live feed such as this one, it would be all too easy to have material widely disseminated before the publisher is even aware of it. By blindly republishing tweets, the Conservative Party has left itself open to such complaints.

Another new media tactic used by the website encourages site users to bombard Charlie Whelan with tweets. This could constitute harassment, for which the Conservative Party could potentially end up liable.

Related opinions

80% hours for 100% pay? That’ll do nicely

As has been widely reported this week, some 3,000 UK workers are taking part in a six month trial to assess the viability of a four-day working week without any reduction in their normal pay.

View blog

Right to Work Checks: Changes from 6 April 2022

From 6 April 2022, right to work checks on all migrant or settled prospective employees must be online and checks on British or Irish nationals will be manual (free) or digital (charged for).

View blog

Are whistleblowers entitled to keep their employer’s confidential documents?

In Nissan v Passi, the High Court recently considered the issue of an employee retaining confidential documents belonging to his former employer in the context of the employer’s application for an injunction seeking the return of such documents from the employee.

View blog

Supreme Court awards compensation to a Professor for an invention created during his employment

A recent decision by the Supreme Court in Shanks v Unilever PLC has supported the right for employees to receive compensation for patented inventions if the invention is of ‘outstanding benefit’.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up