0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

My invention might not work - is it patentable?

22 September 2008

Answer - it could be.

Inventions must be novel and contain an inventive step in order to be capable of being protected by a patent. There has been some recent debate as to whether an "inventive step" requires the invention to be shown to work, or whether patentability requires only that the invention is worth trying. Overturning decisions from the lower courts the House of Lords has now given its view on this issue in Conor Medsystems Inc v Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Angiotech, a Canadian company, applied for a patent for a stent (preventing the walls of arteries collapsing). A problem associated with the insertion of stents is that this can sometimes cause tissue damage, which promotes the development of new tissue, which can itself narrow the healed artery (a process called restenosis). The stent which was the subject of the patent application is coated with taxol (a substance used in cancer treatments) to prevent restenosis.

It was argued successfully before the High Court and the Court of Appeal that, since the patent specification did not contain data relating to whether and how coating stents with taxol would work, and that on this basis the patent was no more than an idea that it might work, the patent did not contain an inventive step and was therefore invalid.

The House of Lords took a different view, deciding that there was no requirement that the patent specification must demonstrate that the invention would work or why it would work. The correct question is whether the invention is obvious. On this basis the patent was found to be valid.

This decision, which is in line with two parallel Dutch cases, has been welcomed by patentees and is important for all those considering the validity of their own and others patents. As a result of the decision, a patents validity cannot be attacked on the basis that the invention would be carried out without any expectation of success. However, it has not affected the continuing requirement that the specification must include sufficient information to ensure that the invention can be carried out.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Presenting a winding up petition to recover pandemic rent arrears

The government has now published new regulations to replace the winding up restrictions mentioned above from 1 October 2021. The key point of interest from a landlord and tenant perspective is that these new regulations will prevent a landlord from presenting a winding up petition to recover rent until 31 March 2022 where the sums are unpaid by the tenant because of the financial effect of the pandemic.

View

Legal updates

The government’s plans for dealing with Covid-19 rent arrears – some more details emerge

Last week, the government published a policy statement to deal with rent arrears accrued during the pandemic for those businesses affected by the pandemic.

View

Legal updates

Restrictions on landlords’ remedies extended again and extra protection to be given to certain businesses

The delay in the full easing of lockdown restrictions and the knock on effect for certain tenants (particularly those in the hospitality and entertainment industry) has clearly caused a change of heart and the government has now announced a further extension of the restrictions.

View

Legal updates

Commercial rents and Covid-19: Call for evidence

The government announced that it would be launching a call for evidence to help monitor the overall progress of negotiations between landlords and tenants for paying or writing off outstanding rents. This call for evidence has now been published.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mark Daniels

Mark Daniels

Partner and Head of Business Services

View profile

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up