0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

repayment of sums paid in advance following exercise of break clause

2 December 2015

The Supreme Court has today unanimously upheld the Court of Appeal decision that where a tenant exercises a right to break a lease, no term should generally be implied that the landlord must reimburse that tenant for sums paid in advance which relate to any period after the break date.

In this case, the tenant had four leases, each with identical break rights on 24 January 2012. Operation of the break clauses was conditional (amongst other things) on there being no arrears of basic rent on the break date.

As required by case law, the tenant paid the full quarter’s rents due on 25 December 2011 and successfully exercised the break rights. However, today’s ruling means that it cannot claim reimbursement of nearly £1m paid in advance covering the period from the break date up to the next quarter day.

It therefore remains imperative when negotiating a break clause in a lease to ensure that the lease contains an express clause obliging the landlord to reimburse such advance payments.

focus on...

Legal updates

Landlord succeeds in opposing business tenant’s right of renewal by contriving an entirely artificial scheme of works

The judgment in S Franses Ltd v The Cavendish Hotel (London) Ltd [2017] EWHC 1670 (QB) was handed down on 3 July 2017, and it certainly makes for interesting reading.

View

Legal updates

Property Managers Association event 2015

For the third year running, we are delighted to host this year’s Property Managers Association training session. Download slides from the event.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.