0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

ASOS saved from infringement by own name defence

16 April 2015

Online fashion giant ASOS has successfully defended the latest phase of a trade mark infringement claim brought by cycling clothes manufacturer Assos.

The Court of Appeal held, by a 2:1 majority, that ASOS could rely on an ‘own name defence’. This saved ASOS from infringement as the court had concluded ASOS’ use of their house brand resulted in a likelihood of confusion with Assos’ registered trade mark when a notional and fair use by Assos in relation to all the goods in respect of the mark is registered, was taken into account (including those goods which ASOS had not yet applied its mark to or which it had only sold in limited numbers).

There was no real evidence of confusion in practice, despite a decade of co-existence, hence the High Court’s conclusion there was not a likelihood of confusion. However, after the High Court decision the General Court and Court of Justice of the European Union had confirmed the finding of such a likelihood between ASOS and ASSOS in parallel opposition proceedings.

The own name defence may therefore have offered the Court of Appeal a means of achieving fairness in these circumstances, without handing down a decision that sat uncomfortably beside that of the European courts.

related opinions

Equal pay at ASDA stores - appeal to the Supreme Court unsuccessful

35,000 workers working in ASDA’s retail business sought to compare themselves to workers at distribution depots for equal pay purposes. Find out more about this Employment Appeal Tribunal.

View blog

Service charges – the bad news keeps coming for tenants!

A few months ago, we discussed a case where the Court of Appeal ruled that the wording of a lease precluded the tenant from arguing that certain costs should not have been included in the service charge calculation. A recent high-profile case concerns a broadly similar issue, this time in relation to the proportion of the landlord’s costs payable by a tenant.

View blog

A landlord’s service charge certificate was conclusive as to the sums payable by a tenant under a lease

The Court of Appeal has ruled that the wording of a service charge clause precluded a tenant from challenging the sums claimed by a landlord.

View blog

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not fulfil a vacant possession break condition

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. Courts have consistently required strict compliance with the terms of those rights.

View blog

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up