0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

ASOS saved from infringement by own name defence

16 April 2015

Online fashion giant ASOS has successfully defended the latest phase of a trade mark infringement claim brought by cycling clothes manufacturer Assos.

The Court of Appeal held, by a 2:1 majority, that ASOS could rely on an ‘own name defence’. This saved ASOS from infringement as the court had concluded ASOS’ use of their house brand resulted in a likelihood of confusion with Assos’ registered trade mark when a notional and fair use by Assos in relation to all the goods in respect of the mark is registered, was taken into account (including those goods which ASOS had not yet applied its mark to or which it had only sold in limited numbers).

There was no real evidence of confusion in practice, despite a decade of co-existence, hence the High Court’s conclusion there was not a likelihood of confusion. However, after the High Court decision the General Court and Court of Justice of the European Union had confirmed the finding of such a likelihood between ASOS and ASSOS in parallel opposition proceedings.

The own name defence may therefore have offered the Court of Appeal a means of achieving fairness in these circumstances, without handing down a decision that sat uncomfortably beside that of the European courts.

related opinions

A landlord’s service charge certificate was conclusive as to the sums payable by a tenant under a lease

The Court of Appeal has ruled that the wording of a service charge clause precluded a tenant from challenging the sums claimed by a landlord.

View blog

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not fulfil a vacant possession break condition

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. Courts have consistently required strict compliance with the terms of those rights.

View blog

Retail ATMs and business rates: clarity at last!

Judgement has been handed down for the seminal case of Cardtronics UK Ltd and others (Respondents) v Sykes and others (Valuation Officers) (Appellants) [2020] UKSC 21.

View blog

More protection required for retailer workers as violence is on the rise, according to latest statistics

Following an MP debate on 5 November 2019, the government is due to release long-awaited guidance as to how it intends to protect workers in the retail industry against violence, harassment and abuse.

View blog

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up