0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

ASOS saved from infringement by own name defence

16 April 2015

Online fashion giant ASOS has successfully defended the latest phase of a trade mark infringement claim brought by cycling clothes manufacturer Assos.

The Court of Appeal held, by a 2:1 majority, that ASOS could rely on an ‘own name defence’. This saved ASOS from infringement as the court had concluded ASOS’ use of their house brand resulted in a likelihood of confusion with Assos’ registered trade mark when a notional and fair use by Assos in relation to all the goods in respect of the mark is registered, was taken into account (including those goods which ASOS had not yet applied its mark to or which it had only sold in limited numbers).

There was no real evidence of confusion in practice, despite a decade of co-existence, hence the High Court’s conclusion there was not a likelihood of confusion. However, after the High Court decision the General Court and Court of Justice of the European Union had confirmed the finding of such a likelihood between ASOS and ASSOS in parallel opposition proceedings.

The own name defence may therefore have offered the Court of Appeal a means of achieving fairness in these circumstances, without handing down a decision that sat uncomfortably beside that of the European courts.

Related opinions

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not prevent a tenant from exercising a break clause

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. More often than not, tenants have found themselves on the wrong end of the decisions. However, a Court of Appeal decision yesterday has bucked that trend.

View blog

Relief for landlords as the Court of Appeal confirms that leases have been validly contracted out

One of the requirements for tenants to contract out of the security of tenure regime contained in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 is that they make a simple or statutory declaration before entering into the lease.

View blog

Summary judgment stayed where part 26A restructuring plan pending

Landlords should reconsider summary judgment if a Part 26A restructuring plan is pending.

View blog

Landlords’ claims for summary judgment for ‘Covid’ rent arrears succeed (again)

A landlord’s claim for summary judgment to recover rent and service charge arrears accrued since the start of the pandemic against a non-essential retailer succeeded. Like London buses, a second such case has followed hot on its heels.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up