0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

"noted, with thanks” - the perils of negotiating settlement agreements

12 January 2015

A recent decision stresses the importance of expressly stating when a settlement offer is intended to be ‘subject to contract’ (ie not binding until a formal written agreement has been executed).

In Bieber and others v Teathers Limited (in liquidation) the claimants accepted – via email – a settlement offer relating solely to the sum to be paid by the defendants, and stated that they would circulate a draft consent order. The defendant replied “noted, with thanks”. Subsequently, the claimants provided a draft consent order; in response, the defendants proposed a long-form settlement agreement (which included an indemnity for third party claims to the defendant), which the claimants refused to sign.

The judge found that whilst previous offers had been expressed to be subject to contract, the accepted offer was not and no such qualification could be inferred. Strikingly, the judge held that “noted, with thanks” suggested no further terms had to be considered (the defendant should have referred to the remaining issues to be dealt with before an agreement could be concluded). The whole course of negotiations did not suggest that settlement required a signed formal agreement; the offer was clearly intended to include all claims, counterclaims and costs, without any previous attempt to reserve third party claims. It did not matter that the underlying litigation was complex; settlement of the dispute was not.

related opinions

A landlord’s service charge certificate was conclusive as to the sums payable by a tenant under a lease

The Court of Appeal has ruled that the wording of a service charge clause precluded a tenant from challenging the sums claimed by a landlord.

View blog

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not fulfil a vacant possession break condition

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. Courts have consistently required strict compliance with the terms of those rights.

View blog

Retail ATMs and business rates: clarity at last!

Judgement has been handed down for the seminal case of Cardtronics UK Ltd and others (Respondents) v Sykes and others (Valuation Officers) (Appellants) [2020] UKSC 21.

View blog

More protection required for retailer workers as violence is on the rise, according to latest statistics

Following an MP debate on 5 November 2019, the government is due to release long-awaited guidance as to how it intends to protect workers in the retail industry against violence, harassment and abuse.

View blog

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up