0370 270 6000

Employer’s liability for providing negligent references

7 August 2014

In Playboy Club London Ltd and others v Banca Nazionale Del Lavoro SPA, the High Court held that a bank was liable for negligently providing a casino with a reference for one of the bank’s customers, stating that he was financially healthy. Relying on that, the casino allowed the customer to become a member and accepted his cheques, which later turned out to be counterfeit. Acceptance of these cheques led to the casino suffering losses of £1.25 million.

It transpired that the customer’s account with the bank had a balance of nil. The bank denied any responsibility as the reference had been provided by an employee who did not have actual authority to do so and had since been dismissed. Despite this, the court found that the bank still was responsible for providing the reference, regardless of the wrongful conduct of the employee. There was nothing informal about the request for or giving of the reference and the court found that there was no reason for the casino to be cautious about receiving a reference from an employee apparently responsible for the customer’s account.

This case demonstrates the caution businesses should take when their employees give out references and that even if wrongly provided, such references can be held to give rise to legal duties on the part of the employer.

Related opinions

Covid-19 rent arrears – the questions that remain

The Government appears set to announce plans on ‘living with Covid to restore freedom’. With the success of the retail and hospitality sector key to recovery, what protections will be on offer to tenants to deal with Covid-19 rent arrears?

View blog

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not prevent a tenant from exercising a break clause

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. More often than not, tenants have found themselves on the wrong end of the decisions. However, a Court of Appeal decision yesterday has bucked that trend.

View blog

Relief for landlords as the Court of Appeal confirms that leases have been validly contracted out

One of the requirements for tenants to contract out of the security of tenure regime contained in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 is that they make a simple or statutory declaration before entering into the lease.

View blog

Summary judgment stayed where part 26A restructuring plan pending

Landlords should reconsider summary judgment if a Part 26A restructuring plan is pending.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up