0370 270 6000

Restricted user in a lease; breach of competition law?

23 June 2014

The first case relating to competition clauses in leases to be considered is Martin Retail Group Limited –v- Crawley Borough Council, but this is only a County Court decision.

This was a lease renewal of premises in a shopping arcade. The landlord agreed to extend the user but only if it excluded a series of goods including other uses within Class A1 resulting in a letting scheme. The clause being in breach of the Competition Act, could it be saved by an exemption? The Council argued that the letting scheme would be beneficial to all its tenants in the parade; the Court did not accept this. No evidence was offered to substantiate the tenant mix policy. The judge accepted if the scheme was set up amongst all the tenants he might have come to a different decision.

Landlords and tenants need to be aware of the dangers of restrictive covenant provisions becoming void, particularly if it is not possible to sever the clause in question.

Related opinions

Covid-19 rent arrears – the questions that remain

The Government appears set to announce plans on ‘living with Covid to restore freedom’. With the success of the retail and hospitality sector key to recovery, what protections will be on offer to tenants to deal with Covid-19 rent arrears?

View blog

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not prevent a tenant from exercising a break clause

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. More often than not, tenants have found themselves on the wrong end of the decisions. However, a Court of Appeal decision yesterday has bucked that trend.

View blog

Relief for landlords as the Court of Appeal confirms that leases have been validly contracted out

One of the requirements for tenants to contract out of the security of tenure regime contained in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 is that they make a simple or statutory declaration before entering into the lease.

View blog

Summary judgment stayed where part 26A restructuring plan pending

Landlords should reconsider summary judgment if a Part 26A restructuring plan is pending.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up