0370 270 6000

Refuse to mediate at your peril

24 October 2013

In a judgment handed down today the Court of Appeal has taken the opportunity to broaden the principles in Halsey, in relation to awarding costs sanctions against a party who did not ‘beat’ a part 36 offer in court, on the basis of a refusal to mediate.

In the case of PGF II SA v OMFS Company 1 Limited, which centred on a dispute over three dilapidations claims, the judge was persuaded by the argument that not only was the defendant’s silence tantamount to a refusal to mediate, but that the silence itself was unreasonable. He went on to endorse the advice given in the recently published ADR Handbook encouraging parties to consider ADR before taking a case to trial.

This case is of importance to all who embark on litigation. It demonstrates a clear and unequivocal endorsement by the Court of Appeal as to the value of ADR, (including but not limited to mediation) and highlights the fact that a party who refuses to engage in the process of ADR can, and will, face costs sanctions.

Related opinions

Cameras in convenience stores: a potential hornet’s nest..?

A convenience retailer has opted to install cameras (the “Facewatch” system) at a limited number of its English stores to reduce crime and protect its staff.

View blog

Covid-19 rent arrears – the questions that remain

The Government appears set to announce plans on ‘living with Covid to restore freedom’. With the success of the retail and hospitality sector key to recovery, what protections will be on offer to tenants to deal with Covid-19 rent arrears?

View blog

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not prevent a tenant from exercising a break clause

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. More often than not, tenants have found themselves on the wrong end of the decisions. However, a Court of Appeal decision yesterday has bucked that trend.

View blog

Relief for landlords as the Court of Appeal confirms that leases have been validly contracted out

One of the requirements for tenants to contract out of the security of tenure regime contained in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 is that they make a simple or statutory declaration before entering into the lease.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up