0370 270 6000

High Court hands tenants a welcome break

5 August 2013

In Siemens Hearing Instruments Ltd v Friends Life Ltd (2013) the High Court considered whether a break notice, which did not comply with the provisions set out in the lease, was effective to trigger a break clause.

The tenant served notice on the landlord to initiate a break clause in the lease. The lease provided such notice must state it was given under section 24(2) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954. The notice failed to do so and was considered by the landlord as invalid.

The court acknowledged the clause in the lease was clear and therefore the notice did not comply. However the clause did not provide that non-compliance would automatically render the notice invalid or ineffective; accordingly the court held the particular non-compliance was not fatal and the notice deemed valid.

This decision is useful when considering if a notice which does not comply with the terms of a lease or a statutory provision can still be considered to be valid and effective.

Related opinions

Covid-19 rent arrears – the questions that remain

The Government appears set to announce plans on ‘living with Covid to restore freedom’. With the success of the retail and hospitality sector key to recovery, what protections will be on offer to tenants to deal with Covid-19 rent arrears?

View blog

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not prevent a tenant from exercising a break clause

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. More often than not, tenants have found themselves on the wrong end of the decisions. However, a Court of Appeal decision yesterday has bucked that trend.

View blog

Relief for landlords as the Court of Appeal confirms that leases have been validly contracted out

One of the requirements for tenants to contract out of the security of tenure regime contained in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 is that they make a simple or statutory declaration before entering into the lease.

View blog

Summary judgment stayed where part 26A restructuring plan pending

Landlords should reconsider summary judgment if a Part 26A restructuring plan is pending.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up