0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

no primary design right infringement for importing articles manufactured abroad

7 June 2013

The Patents County Court has dismissed a claim that importing plastic microwave containers manufactured in China into the UK amounted to primary design right infringement (under s226 CDPA 1988), which prevents copying – exactly or substantially – of an unregistered design in the UK). The claim was inconsistent with the CDPA 1988 and the principle of territoriality of IP rights.

It was irrelevant that the manufacture overseas was with the “sole intention” of importing articles into the UK; primary infringement of design rights is not generally dependent on the “motive” of the perpetrator once sufficient copying is established.

It is unclear why the claimant failed to rely on section 227 CDPA 1988 (secondary infringement) in its claim, as this prevents importation without permission and for commercial purposes of an article which the importer knows, or has reason to believe, is an infringing article. Design right holders should ensure they carefully consider the basis of their claim at the outset when seeking to pursue an alleged infringer.

related opinions

H&M - fighting the two tier retail market and daring to push for better clarity on turnover rents

H&M is the latest retailer to confront its landlords about this ‘two tier retail market’ in an attempt to explore and negotiate more favourable terms.

View blog

Retail: a tale of two markets

Ann Summers is the latest retailer to have entered into new voluntary deals with the majority of their landlords, rather than using the CVA process.

View blog

Supreme Court stops landlord from circumventing business tenant’s right of renewal with scheme of works designed solely to enable eviction

We previously reported on the High Court decision of S Franses Ltd v The Cavendish Hotel (London) Ltd in which it was held that a landlord’s motive could not prevent it from successfully utilising ‘ground (f)’ under s30(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 to oppose a lease renewal.

View blog

FCA whistleblowing review

The FCA are encouraged to find that the implementation of the new rules has encouraged financial institutions to manage whistleblowing cases and concerns fairly, consistently and in a manner that protects the individual whistleblower.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up