0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

rent battle following the exercise of a break right

21 May 2013

Marks & Spencer (M&S) has won its £1.1m claim against the landlord of its former head office in Paddington.

M&S was claiming for overpaid rent, service charges, insurance rent and car park licence fees after it had exercised a break clause in January 2012 – despite there being no contractual right to do so.

The judge rejected M&S’s first claim that sub-underleases for the premises expressly provided for repayment of rent and other charges for the period after the break clause; instead the judge accepted M&S’s second claim that a term should be implied to that effect adding such a term would be “eminently reasonable”, what the parties meant and “necessary to give business efficacy to the lease”.

Whilst we wait to see if the landlord will appeal at least we have the glimmer of common sense on this topic.

In the meantime our advice is that you always expressly deal with this issue in the lease in order to prevent any ambiguity.

related opinions

Summary judgment stayed where part 26A restructuring plan pending

Landlords should reconsider summary judgment if a Part 26A restructuring plan is pending.

View blog

Landlords’ claims for summary judgment for ‘Covid’ rent arrears succeed (again)

A landlord’s claim for summary judgment to recover rent and service charge arrears accrued since the start of the pandemic against a non-essential retailer succeeded. Like London buses, a second such case has followed hot on its heels.

View blog

The High Court offers no comfort for beleaguered retailers

Whilst this decision may not be surprising, it will undoubtedly send a chill down the spine of retailers in a similar position to The Fragrance Shop.

View blog

Equal pay at ASDA stores - appeal to the Supreme Court unsuccessful

35,000 workers working in ASDA’s retail business sought to compare themselves to workers at distribution depots for equal pay purposes. Find out more about this Employment Appeal Tribunal.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up