0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Rent battle following the exercise of a break right

21 May 2013

Marks & Spencer (M&S) has won its £1.1m claim against the landlord of its former head office in Paddington.

M&S was claiming for overpaid rent, service charges, insurance rent and car park licence fees after it had exercised a break clause in January 2012 – despite there being no contractual right to do so.

The judge rejected M&S’s first claim that sub-underleases for the premises expressly provided for repayment of rent and other charges for the period after the break clause; instead the judge accepted M&S’s second claim that a term should be implied to that effect adding such a term would be “eminently reasonable”, what the parties meant and “necessary to give business efficacy to the lease”.

Whilst we wait to see if the landlord will appeal at least we have the glimmer of common sense on this topic.

In the meantime our advice is that you always expressly deal with this issue in the lease in order to prevent any ambiguity.

Related opinions

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not prevent a tenant from exercising a break clause

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. More often than not, tenants have found themselves on the wrong end of the decisions. However, a Court of Appeal decision yesterday has bucked that trend.

View blog

Relief for landlords as the Court of Appeal confirms that leases have been validly contracted out

One of the requirements for tenants to contract out of the security of tenure regime contained in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 is that they make a simple or statutory declaration before entering into the lease.

View blog

Summary judgment stayed where part 26A restructuring plan pending

Landlords should reconsider summary judgment if a Part 26A restructuring plan is pending.

View blog

Landlords’ claims for summary judgment for ‘Covid’ rent arrears succeed (again)

A landlord’s claim for summary judgment to recover rent and service charge arrears accrued since the start of the pandemic against a non-essential retailer succeeded. Like London buses, a second such case has followed hot on its heels.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up