0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

qualifying period for unfair dismissal to be removed for those dismissed for political opinion or affiliation

9 February 2013

The government has confirmed that it is to amend the law in light of Redfearn v UK.

Mr Redfearn argued he had been dismissed after becoming a BNP councillor, i.e. on grounds of his political affiliation. He was unable to claim unfair dismissal against his employer, Bradford City Council, because he did not have the continuity of employment needed to do so. He was unsuccessful with a claim under the Race Relations Act 1976 – his complaint was of discrimination on political grounds, outside of the scope of discrimination legislation. The European Court held the continuity requirement breached Article 11 of the European Convention, namely the right to protest and to freedom of association.

As a result, no continuity of service will be needed where the alleged dismissal is on grounds of political belief or affiliation. Employers must not overlook this new exemption when proposing to dismiss any employee who has not attained the relevant continuity of employment for a standard unfair dismissal claim.

related opinions

H&M - fighting the two tier retail market and daring to push for better clarity on turnover rents

H&M is the latest retailer to confront its landlords about this ‘two tier retail market’ in an attempt to explore and negotiate more favourable terms.

View blog

Retail: a tale of two markets

Ann Summers is the latest retailer to have entered into new voluntary deals with the majority of their landlords, rather than using the CVA process.

View blog

Supreme Court stops landlord from circumventing business tenant’s right of renewal with scheme of works designed solely to enable eviction

We previously reported on the High Court decision of S Franses Ltd v The Cavendish Hotel (London) Ltd in which it was held that a landlord’s motive could not prevent it from successfully utilising ‘ground (f)’ under s30(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 to oppose a lease renewal.

View blog

FCA whistleblowing review

The FCA are encouraged to find that the implementation of the new rules has encouraged financial institutions to manage whistleblowing cases and concerns fairly, consistently and in a manner that protects the individual whistleblower.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up