0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Court of Appeal rules unpaid schemes unlawful

15 February 2013

Two appellants have argued successfully that the Government’s back to work schemes were legally flawed.

Caitlin Reilly, who did voluntary work at a museum as she was interested in getting into the sector, was advised she would lose her Job Seekers Allowance if she did not undertake unpaid work at Poundland.

Former HGV driver Jamieson Wilson, who had been out of work since 2008, was required to do 30 hours unpaid work a week for six months distributing renovated furniture. He objected as his work needs had not been considered but was advised he would lose his benefits.

A policy that aims to ensure the unemployed are actively seeking employment and applies sanctions where there is lack of co-operation will save public money. However, such schemes should assist with career development and be clear about the obligations involved. The loss of benefits can cause hardship so it is right these schemes should be authorised by Parliament. The DWP is considering an appeal and new regulations.

Related opinions

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not prevent a tenant from exercising a break clause

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. More often than not, tenants have found themselves on the wrong end of the decisions. However, a Court of Appeal decision yesterday has bucked that trend.

View blog

Relief for landlords as the Court of Appeal confirms that leases have been validly contracted out

One of the requirements for tenants to contract out of the security of tenure regime contained in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 is that they make a simple or statutory declaration before entering into the lease.

View blog

Summary judgment stayed where part 26A restructuring plan pending

Landlords should reconsider summary judgment if a Part 26A restructuring plan is pending.

View blog

Landlords’ claims for summary judgment for ‘Covid’ rent arrears succeed (again)

A landlord’s claim for summary judgment to recover rent and service charge arrears accrued since the start of the pandemic against a non-essential retailer succeeded. Like London buses, a second such case has followed hot on its heels.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up