0370 270 6000

Government to name and shame employers

6 September 2012

By law, all employers have to pay employees at the national minimum wage (NMW) which may be enforced by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC). In a recent case the Government has committed to clamping down on employers who break the law in this respect.

Following a HMRC investigation, Rita Patel, trading as Treena Professional Hair & Beauty, was ordered by the court to pay £3,361.22 in arrears of NMW to an employee. In 2010 Mrs Patel paid the employee just £342 for 20 weeks’ work; however by law the employee was entitled to £3,703.22.

Norman Lamb (former Minister for Employment Relations) stressed that “any worker who is entitled to the minimum wage should receive it, that’s why we are committed to clamping down on those who break the law.”

Employers should take note: part of the Government’s commitment is to publicise cases where arrears of wages are enforced by the courts, resulting in non-compliant employers facing financial and reputational damage.

Related opinions

Covid-19 rent arrears – the questions that remain

The Government appears set to announce plans on ‘living with Covid to restore freedom’. With the success of the retail and hospitality sector key to recovery, what protections will be on offer to tenants to deal with Covid-19 rent arrears?

View blog

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not prevent a tenant from exercising a break clause

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. More often than not, tenants have found themselves on the wrong end of the decisions. However, a Court of Appeal decision yesterday has bucked that trend.

View blog

Relief for landlords as the Court of Appeal confirms that leases have been validly contracted out

One of the requirements for tenants to contract out of the security of tenure regime contained in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 is that they make a simple or statutory declaration before entering into the lease.

View blog

Summary judgment stayed where part 26A restructuring plan pending

Landlords should reconsider summary judgment if a Part 26A restructuring plan is pending.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up