Please sign in with your existing account details.
Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.
Privacy statement - Terms and conditions
Forgotten your password?
You have exceeded the maximum number of login attempts for this email address and your account has been locked. An email has been sent to member of Browne Jacobson's web team and some one will be contacting you over the next two working days with details of how to change your password.
Are you sure you want to remove this item from you pinned content?
It would seem that it is not only the tenants that are continuing to suffer during the current harsh economic conditions. Recent press has followed the decline of two well established brands, namely La Senza and Blacks. Both retailers appointed top accountancy firms to implement emergency rescue plans, known as “pre-pack administrations” .
A pre-pack administration affords struggling companies some protection from their creditors. However, landlords as unsecured creditors, are unable to protect their interests as they are unaware of the pre-pack administration.
Whilst the sale of both the La Senza and Blacks businesses has prevented a further two faces from disappearing from the high street, it has left landlords feeling the sting of a further two pre-pack administrations. Perhaps the sensible solution is for landlords to enter into negotiations with their tenants at the first signs of trouble as surely a reduced income is better than having a huge rental bill wiped clean courtesy of a pre-pack administration?
Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. More often than not, tenants have found themselves on the wrong end of the decisions. However, a Court of Appeal decision yesterday has bucked that trend.
View blog
One of the requirements for tenants to contract out of the security of tenure regime contained in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 is that they make a simple or statutory declaration before entering into the lease.
Landlords should reconsider summary judgment if a Part 26A restructuring plan is pending.
A landlord’s claim for summary judgment to recover rent and service charge arrears accrued since the start of the pandemic against a non-essential retailer succeeded. Like London buses, a second such case has followed hot on its heels.
Partner
Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.
Sign up