0370 270 6000

Vax clean up

9 November 2011

Dyson has lost its appeal against the High Court’s decision that Vax’s Mach Zen vacuum cleaner does not infringe Dyson’s registered design for its DC02 vacuum cleaner.

The High Court had dismissed Dyson’s infringement claim on the basis that the Mach Zen produced a different overall impression on the informed user. Dyson appealed the decision but the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal emphasising that the key legal issues was whether the Mach Zen did or did not produce on the informed user a different overall impression and, in this case, the Mach Zen did indeed produce a different overall impression with the court noting that there were in fact ‘substantial differences’.

This case is a reminder that even if you have broad registered design protection, the use by a third party of a similar design will not amount to infringement if that design produces a different overall impression on the informed user (a knowledgeable user of the product).

Related opinions

Covid-19 rent arrears – the questions that remain

The Government appears set to announce plans on ‘living with Covid to restore freedom’. With the success of the retail and hospitality sector key to recovery, what protections will be on offer to tenants to deal with Covid-19 rent arrears?

View blog

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not prevent a tenant from exercising a break clause

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. More often than not, tenants have found themselves on the wrong end of the decisions. However, a Court of Appeal decision yesterday has bucked that trend.

View blog

Relief for landlords as the Court of Appeal confirms that leases have been validly contracted out

One of the requirements for tenants to contract out of the security of tenure regime contained in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 is that they make a simple or statutory declaration before entering into the lease.

View blog

Summary judgment stayed where part 26A restructuring plan pending

Landlords should reconsider summary judgment if a Part 26A restructuring plan is pending.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up