0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

mitigate don’t litigate

21 October 2011

All Claimants have a duty to mitigate their loss for the purpose of claiming compensation in the Employment Tribunal. But how far does this duty go when offered redeployment by their employer?

In the case of Debique v Ministry of Defence the Claimant succeeded in her claim for indirect race and sex discrimination. However the Court of Appeal held she had failed to mitigate her loss by rejecting redeployment which would have provided stability and addressed her childcare difficulties. Therefore there was no award for loss of earnings; only for her injured feelings.

Claimants will argue that it is unreasonable to expect them to continue working for an employer when they have suffered discrimination. However, the size of the army and the number of bases around the country was a factor in this particular case. Large multinationals or retailers therefore may be able to rely on this decision when a Claimant has been offered and refused a role at another location working with different individuals.

related opinions

Equal pay at ASDA stores - appeal to the Supreme Court unsuccessful

35,000 workers working in ASDA’s retail business sought to compare themselves to workers at distribution depots for equal pay purposes. Find out more about this Employment Appeal Tribunal.

View blog

Service charges – the bad news keeps coming for tenants!

A few months ago, we discussed a case where the Court of Appeal ruled that the wording of a lease precluded the tenant from arguing that certain costs should not have been included in the service charge calculation. A recent high-profile case concerns a broadly similar issue, this time in relation to the proportion of the landlord’s costs payable by a tenant.

View blog

A landlord’s service charge certificate was conclusive as to the sums payable by a tenant under a lease

The Court of Appeal has ruled that the wording of a service charge clause precluded a tenant from challenging the sums claimed by a landlord.

View blog

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not fulfil a vacant possession break condition

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. Courts have consistently required strict compliance with the terms of those rights.

View blog

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up