0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Mitigate don’t litigate

21 October 2011

All Claimants have a duty to mitigate their loss for the purpose of claiming compensation in the Employment Tribunal. But how far does this duty go when offered redeployment by their employer?

In the case of Debique v Ministry of Defence the Claimant succeeded in her claim for indirect race and sex discrimination. However the Court of Appeal held she had failed to mitigate her loss by rejecting redeployment which would have provided stability and addressed her childcare difficulties. Therefore there was no award for loss of earnings; only for her injured feelings.

Claimants will argue that it is unreasonable to expect them to continue working for an employer when they have suffered discrimination. However, the size of the army and the number of bases around the country was a factor in this particular case. Large multinationals or retailers therefore may be able to rely on this decision when a Claimant has been offered and refused a role at another location working with different individuals.

Related opinions

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not prevent a tenant from exercising a break clause

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. More often than not, tenants have found themselves on the wrong end of the decisions. However, a Court of Appeal decision yesterday has bucked that trend.

View blog

Relief for landlords as the Court of Appeal confirms that leases have been validly contracted out

One of the requirements for tenants to contract out of the security of tenure regime contained in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 is that they make a simple or statutory declaration before entering into the lease.

View blog

Summary judgment stayed where part 26A restructuring plan pending

Landlords should reconsider summary judgment if a Part 26A restructuring plan is pending.

View blog

Landlords’ claims for summary judgment for ‘Covid’ rent arrears succeed (again)

A landlord’s claim for summary judgment to recover rent and service charge arrears accrued since the start of the pandemic against a non-essential retailer succeeded. Like London buses, a second such case has followed hot on its heels.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up