0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Misunderstandings and mistaken intentions

17 October 2011

When issuing a notice of termination of employment the general rule is that a clear and unambiguous notice is to be taken at face value and an employer has no right to withdraw it. However, there are certain situations (e.g. where notice is given in the heat of the moment) where this does not apply. These are known as the “special circumstances” exceptions.

What about when an employer intends to terminate the employment but on the basis of a misunderstanding? The Court of Appeal has held in CF Capital v Willoughby that an employer’s mistake in issuing notice of termination before agreement with the employee had been reached was not a special circumstance. The employer had intended to terminate her contract therefore it could not be unilaterally withdrawn.

If there is any scope for misunderstanding in a dismissal scenario employers are advised to send a note of the proposal and seek agreement from the employee before issuing the notice of termination.

Related opinions

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not prevent a tenant from exercising a break clause

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. More often than not, tenants have found themselves on the wrong end of the decisions. However, a Court of Appeal decision yesterday has bucked that trend.

View blog

Relief for landlords as the Court of Appeal confirms that leases have been validly contracted out

One of the requirements for tenants to contract out of the security of tenure regime contained in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 is that they make a simple or statutory declaration before entering into the lease.

View blog

Summary judgment stayed where part 26A restructuring plan pending

Landlords should reconsider summary judgment if a Part 26A restructuring plan is pending.

View blog

Landlords’ claims for summary judgment for ‘Covid’ rent arrears succeed (again)

A landlord’s claim for summary judgment to recover rent and service charge arrears accrued since the start of the pandemic against a non-essential retailer succeeded. Like London buses, a second such case has followed hot on its heels.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up