0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Pay-cuts – fair if everyone’s in the same boat?

6 July 2011

As employers look to cut costs, the employment appeal tribunal has given guidance to those seeking to impose pay-cuts.

Building maintenance company Garside and Laycock faced trading difficulties and sought to reduce employees’ pay by 5%. Mr Booth was the only employee out of 88 not to accept the pay-cut and was dismissed.

The EAT set aside an employment tribunal’s decision that Mr Booth was unfairly dismissed and in doing so reminded us that:

  • a proposed pay-cut need not be “vital for the employer’s survival” to justify a dismissal for not accepting it
  • when considering fairness the correct question to ask is whether it was reasonable for the employer to have dismissed the employee not whether it was reasonable for the employee to have rejected the proposed pay-cut and
  • whether such a dismissal is fair must be considered “in accordance with equity” and that it may not be equitable if a pay-cut is proposed for the majority of the workforce but excludes management

Related opinions

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not prevent a tenant from exercising a break clause

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. More often than not, tenants have found themselves on the wrong end of the decisions. However, a Court of Appeal decision yesterday has bucked that trend.

View blog

Relief for landlords as the Court of Appeal confirms that leases have been validly contracted out

One of the requirements for tenants to contract out of the security of tenure regime contained in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 is that they make a simple or statutory declaration before entering into the lease.

View blog

Summary judgment stayed where part 26A restructuring plan pending

Landlords should reconsider summary judgment if a Part 26A restructuring plan is pending.

View blog

Landlords’ claims for summary judgment for ‘Covid’ rent arrears succeed (again)

A landlord’s claim for summary judgment to recover rent and service charge arrears accrued since the start of the pandemic against a non-essential retailer succeeded. Like London buses, a second such case has followed hot on its heels.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up