0370 270 6000

Pay-cuts – fair if everyone’s in the same boat?

6 July 2011

As employers look to cut costs, the employment appeal tribunal has given guidance to those seeking to impose pay-cuts.

Building maintenance company Garside and Laycock faced trading difficulties and sought to reduce employees’ pay by 5%. Mr Booth was the only employee out of 88 not to accept the pay-cut and was dismissed.

The EAT set aside an employment tribunal’s decision that Mr Booth was unfairly dismissed and in doing so reminded us that:

  • a proposed pay-cut need not be “vital for the employer’s survival” to justify a dismissal for not accepting it
  • when considering fairness the correct question to ask is whether it was reasonable for the employer to have dismissed the employee not whether it was reasonable for the employee to have rejected the proposed pay-cut and
  • whether such a dismissal is fair must be considered “in accordance with equity” and that it may not be equitable if a pay-cut is proposed for the majority of the workforce but excludes management

Related opinions

Cameras in convenience stores: a potential hornet’s nest..?

A convenience retailer has opted to install cameras (the “Facewatch” system) at a limited number of its English stores to reduce crime and protect its staff.

View blog

Covid-19 rent arrears – the questions that remain

The Government appears set to announce plans on ‘living with Covid to restore freedom’. With the success of the retail and hospitality sector key to recovery, what protections will be on offer to tenants to deal with Covid-19 rent arrears?

View blog

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not prevent a tenant from exercising a break clause

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. More often than not, tenants have found themselves on the wrong end of the decisions. However, a Court of Appeal decision yesterday has bucked that trend.

View blog

Relief for landlords as the Court of Appeal confirms that leases have been validly contracted out

One of the requirements for tenants to contract out of the security of tenure regime contained in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 is that they make a simple or statutory declaration before entering into the lease.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up