0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

whiplash consultation

11 December 2012

The Government will publish its proposals to extend the small claims track limit for personal injury claims and tackle whiplash this morning. The consultation will be issued against a background of extensive reforms aimed at bringing the costs of claims under control.

The Government suggests that fraudulent or exaggerated claims will be reduced if more are handled through the small claims track, and so proposes that the small claims limit for either whiplash or all injury claims might be increased from £1,000 to £5,000.

Historically the small claims track has often been unattractive to insurers as the general rule is that costs are not recoverable, so an insurer defeating a claim would still not recover their own legal costs. However, when the Government introduces Qualified One Way Costs shifting for injury claims on other tracks in April 2013, insurers will rarely recover costs in any event which will make the small claims track (in which claimants are also restricted in terms of their costs recovery) a much more attractive prospect.

The move will, however, present practical difficulties. The abridged small claims track procedure, which typically allows only a few weeks from exchange of evidence to a hearing, offers limited scope for interrogation of claimants evidence to establish its veracity, while short hearings will provide limited time for cross examination. It may become more difficult for defendants to prove fraud in that forum.

The deterrent effect the Government seeks therefore seems more likely to arise through making claims less profitable and more of a challenge to run. The restrictive costs rule of the small claims track currently mean that many litigants on it either have to fund the claim themselves, or proceed without legal representation.

Here too, reforms will substantially change the picture. With the availability of Damages Based Agreements (whereby lawyers can take a percentage of their clients damages to fund a claim) and law firms and other businesses already aligning themselves to achieve profitability in a world of reduced costs, funding of small claims may become more viable after April 2013.

A more promising proposal may be the introduction of medical panels of assessors to diagnose whiplash claims. An industry has grown up around the production of medical reports in relation to such claims, with claimants inevitably going back time and again to experts who are more likely to make a favourable diagnosis. At the same time, defendants and their insurers become distrustful of those experts and their reports.

Costs of reports might be reduced via use of industry agreed panels of experts with fixed fees at a reasonable level. This would also reduce the ability of either party to cherry pick experts and encourage experts to share knowledge and experience, and ensure reports are balanced. It may also create greater trust on all sides, which should make it easier to settle claims based on the expert evidence received.

The Governments ambition of reducing fraudulent and exaggerated claims should be applauded. However, changes introduced without adequate consideration of the wider impacts could have the opposite effect, while also harming the interests of legitimate claimants. The changes already due to be introduced in April leave an uncertain background against which any reforms would be introduced, increasing the risk of unintended consequences.

focus on...

Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.

View

Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.

View

Legal updates

Coronavirus (COVID-19) insurance considerations

With instances of COVID-19 rapidly increasing throughout the UK, many businesses are considering the options available to limit staff and customer exposure to Coronavirus.

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory newsletter - February 2020

Read our latest insurance newsletter for our clients and contacts across the financial services market with quarterly updates and insights on topical legal and regulatory issues.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up