0370 270 6000

Forde v Birmingham City Council, High Court, 13 January 2009

22 January 2010
The issues

Success fee – second CFA – retrospective CFA – whether respective CFA contrary to public policy – whether retrospective CFA enforceable – whether success fee enforceable.



A CFA could be retrospective. If it were the case that a retrospective success fee was contrary to public policy that did not vitiate the CFA as a whole and therefore basic costs were still recoverable.

However, in the view of the Court, a retrospective success fee was not contrary to public policy but was vulnerable to reduction or elimination on assessment.

In some cases a retrospective success fee might be unreasonable, either as between the parties or as between solicitor and client but it would not always be so. The Court had enough weapons in its armoury in the form of the criteria applicable on a Detailed Assessment and the provisions of the Costs Practice Direction and the Practice Direction on protocols to disallow or reduce retrospective fees that were unreasonable. There was no reason why the Court could not place its blue pencil through the success fee provision leaving the obligation to pay basic charges unaffected.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up