0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Drive Assist backs down in electronic signature appeal

26 June 2009

The validity of credit hire agreements that have been signed using electronically imported signatures is once again being called into question.

In the case of Tyrell v Staniforth [2009], heard at Northampton County Court, in-house counsel for Browne Jacobson LLP argued that the claimant should not be entitled to recover any of her claim for credit hire charges, because she freely admitted having never signed a credit hire agreement with Drive Assist, the credit hire company.

The claimant, Miss Tyrell, gave evidence that she had been offered a courtesy car by her insurers; and that when the vehicle was delivered she was simply asked to sign an electronic pad to acknowledge receipt of the vehicle. After the vehicle was returned, she received a copy of the terms & conditions, complete with her signature incorporated into the hire agreement.

So as not to penalise Miss Tyrell, who was an innocent party, the District Judge awarded the claim in full. The defendant appealed on the basis that the claimant had no residual liability to pay the credit hire charges, as she openly accepted she was not made aware of her liability until after the vehicle hire had ended.

On appeal, Drive Assist decided not to defend their practice of unilaterally completing hire agreements using the imported signature of clients who sign a hand-held device. This contrasts with earlier comments attributed to Ralph Ferguson, claims director at Drive Assist, who said:

"We are satisfied that our procedures for ensuring customers understand the credit hire agreement are rigorous and would stand up to any scrutiny, and that the agreements are enforceable." (Post Magazine, Nov 2008).

As a result the company consented to repay the full value of the credit hire charges totalling £1,179.10.

The result follows the recent case of Company Call Centre Technology v Sheehan [2009], involving another credit hire company, in which Browne Jacobson LLP successfully argued that credit hire agreements, signed months after the vehicle hire period had come to an end, did not create a liability.

According to recent media reports, the rise in claims made by credit hire companies adds £20 to the average insurance premium of every UK motorist. We advise making careful enquiries of claimants who have hired vehicles on credit hire terms.

Focus on...

Broker Insight event

Catch up with our Broker Insight on-demand video. With many intermediaries looking to buy, sell or seek external investment, we explored the elements of a successful M&A transaction.

View

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.

View

Legal updates

Contribution claims post settlement – Percy v Merriman White & David Mayal [2021] EWHC 22 (Ch)

This claim addresses the question of whether a collateral defence can be raised to a claim for contribution following a settlement under the Contribution Act 1978 (“the Act”) and the apportionment of liability for negligence between a solicitor and a barrister.

View

Legal updates

Insurance Annual Review 2020-2021

In our review of developments in 2020 and analysis of some of the important issues on the horizon in 2021, we share insights that we hope will enable you to rise to the challenges, and make the most of the opportunities, which lie ahead across various sectors and lines of business.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up