0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Copley v Lawn and Maden v Haller, Court of Appeal, 17 June 2009

26 June 2009

Judgment in Copley v Lawn and Maden v Haller was handed down last week on 17 June 2009.

The case concerned insurers (or any other third party) offering free replacement cars as opposed to claimants hiring on a credit hire basis.

Judgment was entered for the claimants and the Court found that it was not unreasonable to reject or ignore an offer, where it does not make the cost of hire clear to the defendant, thereby enabling them to make a realistic comparison with the cost they are about to incur.

Conversely, if a claimant does have clear details of the alternative vehicle and cost, and proceeds to reject or ignore it, they may be considered to have acted unreasonably. The claimant, however, will still be entitled to at least the cost, which the defendant can show they would reasonably have incurred. As a result, the claimant would not forfeit the damages claim altogether.

The Court also refused permission to appeal the decision to the House of Lords.

focus on...

Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


Legal updates

Coronavirus (COVID-19) insurance considerations

With instances of COVID-19 rapidly increasing throughout the UK, many businesses are considering the options available to limit staff and customer exposure to Coronavirus.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up