0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

highway authorities responsibility

11 October 2007

Now that our glorious summer has passed(!), thoughts will inevitably turn to winter. It therefore seems appropriate to comment upon a recent County Court decision reminding us of a highway authoritys duty to clear snow and ice from highways.

In Rhiannon Pace v Swansea City and County Councils [2007] the Court reiterated the existing stance confirmed in the earlier case of Goodes v East Sussex County Council [2000].

In Pace a road traffic accident had been caused by ice on the road although the highway authority had a statutory defence under the Highways Act 1980, as it had in place, an adequate policy for salting the roads which was being implemented at the time of the accident.

The highway authority contended that the road in question had been salted in the early hours of the morning in accordance with a reasonable and proper system. The judge found that the accident was caused by the claimants own failure to control her car properly. However, the judge also found that the highway authority had an adequate and proper policy for treating roads.

The court reiterated that it was impossible for a highway authority to eliminate all risks of ice forming on the roads. It could place limitless amounts of salt on the road which would effectively increase levels of protection, but that would be undesirable in terms of economic and environmental cost.

Under Section 41 Highways Act, the highways authority has a duty to maintain highways maintainable at public expense. Section 41 (1A) goes on to say that "highway authorities are under a duty to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that safe passage along a highway is not endangered by snow or ice".

Whilst this case is a first instance decision, it does confirm that the courts stance when dealing with these claims remains the same. In Pace there was no doubt that ice had formed and that this in part caused the accident. Therefore highway authorities can defend these types of claims if they can show an operational plan to treat highways in inclement weather, in accordance with accepted practices, using sufficient quantities of salt to address the foreseeable risks.

This is a very good, common sense judgment that should provide some comfort to highway authorities with a proper system in place.

focus on...

Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


Legal updates

Coronavirus (COVID-19) insurance considerations

With instances of COVID-19 rapidly increasing throughout the UK, many businesses are considering the options available to limit staff and customer exposure to Coronavirus.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up