0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

R v Clifton Steel Limited, Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), 13 June 2007

6 July 2007
The issues

Health & Safety Executive – health & safety offences – appropriate fine.

The facts

The Defendant was a company that bought steel in coil form and processed it into sheets before selling it on. The person who had been issued was lowering and manoeuvring a steel coil which weighed approximately 9 tonnes. The coil was on the top of a stack which was 3 coils high. As the coil was manoeuvred using a crane, a stack behind moved causing the victim to be crushed between the suspended coil he had been manoeuvring and the coil that had moved from the stack behind him. He died. The company pleaded guilty and was fined £150,000.00. The company appealed against the level of the fine.

The decision

The company had not failed to adhere to any recognised code because there was no guidance regarding steel stock holding. However there had been no risk assessment of the hazards involved in removing the steel coils from the stacks. There was an innovative method used by the company and after the accident the Health & Safety Executive carried out tests which revealed some areas of concern. The Judge appeared to have adopted a starting point of £200,000.00. Fines should exceed £100,000.00 only in really serious cases. As the number of cases in which health & safety breaches had resulted in a death, only 3.6% of those liable were ordered to pay £150,000.00 or more. The Court had to have regard to the degree of culpability and the damage caused, the previous offending record of the company and the attitude and actions it took afterwards. The company had co-operated fully and had entered a guilty plea at the earliest opportunity. It had taken steps to improve Health & Safety procedures and was genuinely remorseful. The balance had to be struck between penalising the company and the need to maintain a business to protect existing employees. The penalty was manifestfully excessive and the fine of £100,000.00 was substituted.

focus on...

Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.

View

Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.

View

Legal updates

Coronavirus (COVID-19) insurance considerations

With instances of COVID-19 rapidly increasing throughout the UK, many businesses are considering the options available to limit staff and customer exposure to Coronavirus.

View

Legal updates

Insurance annual review 2019-2020

Welcome to our review of 2019 as we look ahead to what is on the horizon for the insurance sector in 2020.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up