0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Bull & Ors v Nottinghamshire & City of Nottingham Fire Rescue Authority, Court of Appeal, 28 February 2007

22 March 2007
The issues

Fire fighters – contractual duties – fire brigade – whether co-responding part of an employees contractual duties.

The facts

The Fire Authorities had sought to ask fire fighters, as part of their ordinary duties, to administer first aid and basic medical intervention when attending emergencies and in situations where ambulance crews could not attend promptly. Declarations had been made in favour of the fire fighters that these duties (“co-responding duties”) did not form part of their contractual duties. The Fire Authorities appealed against those declarations seeking declarations to the contrary.

The decision

The Judge had found that the co-responding duties were beyond the scope of a fire fighter’s contractual obligations and in so doing called in support the fact that the Grey Book, which was incorporated into the contracts of employment, made no specific mention of co-responding duties. The Judge had been correct. The Grey Book, which set out in detail a fire fighter’s duties, had been amended following a pay dispute, which was settled some 3 years before. The Grey Book, as amended, repeated the terms of the settlement of the dispute and was important in construing the contract of employment. The Fire Brigade Union had always opposed the concept of co-responding and in the settlement of the pay dispute no concessions were made in that regard. The co-responding duties were so different from what common sense would hold that fire fighters were expected to do, that it could only be the case that such duties could be imposed expressly and not by influence.

Appeal dismissed.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up