0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Lindsay v Wood, High Court, 16 November 2006

20 December 2006
The issues

Capacity – Masterman-Lister test. Whether Claimant was a patient within the meaning of the Mental Health Act 1983.

The facts

The Claimant had suffered serious brain injuries in a road traffic accident. Liability had been admitted. The Claimant suffered from a mental disorder caused by the accident. There was an issue as to his capacity to conduct the litigation and manage any award of damages.

The decision

Amongst the issues that psychiatrists would consider when taking into account capacity was vulnerability to exploitation. However, this did not of itself lead to the conclusion that there was lack of capacity. The issue was the ability of the Claimant to make a rational decision. In a case of this sort the Claimant might have to weigh up the advantages and the risks of accepting an offer of periodical payment as against an offer of a lump sum plus periodical payments. The evidence suggested that the Claimant would be able to manage such a complex decision or unable to deal with the advice he was likely to receive or give rational instructions based on that advice. The Claimant therefore came within the Masterman- Lister test and was a patient for the purposes of that test. Generally, where the legal team of a Claimant were unable to present a positive case as to whether the Claimant was a patient they should give consideration to seeking an Order of the Court directing the official solicitor to consider the evidence, appoint his own medical expert, appear and make such submissions as were considered appropriate.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up