0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

La Chemise Lacoste SA & ORS v Sketchers USA Ltd, Chancery Division, 24 May 2006

5 June 2006
The issues

Amendment Cost – costs – unreasonable refusal to consent.

The facts

The Applicant wished to amend its Particulars of Claim. Shortly before the Hearing of the Application to amend the Defendant consented. The Application to amend had related to a claim that shoes sold by the Defendant had infringed the Applicant’s design rights. The amendment related to the Applicant’s wish to identify further allegedly infringing products. Consent was sought and not forthcoming. The Defendant in response to the request for consent had indicated that it was withdrawing the offending shoe from sale and suggested mediation or a directions timetable. At the Hearing they argued that they had consented to the amendments or if they had not and their letters were ambiguous that the Applicant should have asked for clarification.

The decision

If the Defendant was consenting clearer words would have been expected. Under the CPR the costs of an amendment that should have been consented to would be laid against the opposing party. Parties in litigation should be sensible about Applications and not unreasonably refuse. The Defendant would pay the Applicant’s costs.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up