0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

La Chemise Lacoste SA & ORS v Sketchers USA Ltd, Chancery Division, 24 May 2006

5 June 2006
The issues

Amendment Cost – costs – unreasonable refusal to consent.

The facts

The Applicant wished to amend its Particulars of Claim. Shortly before the Hearing of the Application to amend the Defendant consented. The Application to amend had related to a claim that shoes sold by the Defendant had infringed the Applicant’s design rights. The amendment related to the Applicant’s wish to identify further allegedly infringing products. Consent was sought and not forthcoming. The Defendant in response to the request for consent had indicated that it was withdrawing the offending shoe from sale and suggested mediation or a directions timetable. At the Hearing they argued that they had consented to the amendments or if they had not and their letters were ambiguous that the Applicant should have asked for clarification.

The decision

If the Defendant was consenting clearer words would have been expected. Under the CPR the costs of an amendment that should have been consented to would be laid against the opposing party. Parties in litigation should be sensible about Applications and not unreasonably refuse. The Defendant would pay the Applicant’s costs.

focus on...

Legal updates

Insurance annual review 2019-2020

Welcome to our review of 2019 as we look ahead to what is on the horizon for the insurance sector in 2020.


Legal updates

Financial Services – ‘Duty of Care’ Bill: consumer protection or damp squib?

The Financial Services Duty of Care Bill (the “Bill”) was introduced into the House of Lords in October 2019 and had its second reading on 9 January 2020.


Legal updates

Noise-induced hearing loss claims – documentation and the expert engineer

Guest writer, Finch Consulting Senior Consultant Teli Chinelis applies his expertise in preparing engineering reports in relation to noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) claims to explain information that is required from the claimant and information that is required and is advisable to be retained by employers, in order to ensure that claims can be fairly represented.


Legal updates

SRA Standards and Regulations November 2019

On Monday 25 November the 2011 SRA Handbook is replaced by the 2019 SRA Standards and Regulations (often referred to as STARS).This is the 26th version of the Code of Conduct for Solicitors.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up