0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Ashton v Director of Public Prosecutions, Divisional Court, 9 November 2005

24 November 2005
The issues

Emergency Vehicles – Ambulance Drivers – Private Vehicles – Whether Private vehicle could be treated as an emergency vehicle – Road Vehicle Lighting Regulations 1989 Regulation 3

The facts

The Defendant used his own private vehicle to respond to a duty call to collect an ambulance and use it to take an ill child to hospital. On his way to collect the ambulance he used a flashing blue light and drove in excess of the applicable speed limits. He was charged in the Magistrate’s Court with offences under the Road Traffic Act 1988 and the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and the Road Vehicle Lighting Regulations 1989. he was convicted on the basis that the Magistrates took the view that the vehicle was not an emergency vehicle in this case an ambulance within the meaning of regulation 3 of the 1989 Regulations because it was not constructed or adapted for the use of sick, injured or disabled people.

The decision

The Magistrates had been entitled to conclude that the Defendant’s vehicle was not an ambulance. It approached the matter correctly by seeking to ascertain whether the vehicle came within the definition contained in the 1989 Regulations.

Appeal dismissed.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).


Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.


Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.


Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up