0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Ricketts v Torbay Council, Court of Appeal, 27 March 2003

7 October 2005
The issues

Workplace (Health Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

The facts

The Claimant was an elderly member of the public who fell when making her way across a public car park. It was alleged against her inter alia that the Defendant was in breach of Regulation 5(1) of the Workplace Regulations. The Defendant argued inter alia that the Workplace Regulations did not apply to the Claimant who did not take the benefit of them. The matter was heard by the Recorder at first instance who held that the Regulations did not afford a right of action to a member of public lawfully visiting the premises. The Claimant appealed to the Court of Appeal.

The decision

The Regulations did not apply to members of the public as a whole. Looking at the Regulations as a whole it was clear that the use in them of the words “a person” or “any person” whether qualified or unqualified by the context, was a reference to workers employed by the employer or who were on his premises for the purpose of working. Leave to appeal dismissed.


For further information please contact Hamish McConachie on hcm@veitchpenny.co.uk

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up