0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Read v Edmed, High Court, 8 December 2004

14 December 2004
The issues

Costs – Part 36 Offer – Offer Matched By Award – Whether Indemnity Costs Appropriate

The facts

The Claimant was injured in a road traffic accident in November 2000 when she was knocked off a bicycle by a car driven by the Defendant. The matter was ordered to be tried on the issue of liability and any related issue of causation as a preliminary issue. Before proceedings the Claimant’s solicitors had offered to settle the case on a 50/50 basis by means of a Part 36 Offer.

The Defendant’s insurers had rejected that offer. When the matter was heard before the Trial Judge preliminary issues were decided on precisely that 50/50 basis. The issue arose as to whether the Claimant should be entitled to indemnity costs from 21 days after the date of the original offer.

The decision

As a matter of principle, where in a relatively uncomplicated claim for damages for personal injuries a valid Part 36 Offer or some other admissible offer had been made to settle a liability issue and the Court gave Judgment in the terms of the offer, the Claimant should be entitled to the benefit of an award of indemnity costs. The only exception to that principle would be if there was some particular circumstance such as a change in the nature of the case or unreasonable conduct on behalf of the Claimant.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up